"A passing reference struck him. Something about a tragedy at Addleton and the singular contents of an
ancient British barrow. Nothing more. Hm. Time travel?"
Poul Anderson, ³Time Patrol², Guardians of Time (Ballantine, 1960)
The antiquarian Thomas Bateman, of Rowsley, Derbyshire, excavated more than 200 barrows in the Derbyshire and Staffordshire Peak District between 1843 and his death in 1861. Presented here is Bateman's own account of his excavations of some the 7th century barrow burials of the Peak Dwellers, extracted from Ten Years' Diggings and Vestiges:
On the 10th of September we opened the gravehill of a Saxon lady, at Wyaston, Derbyshire, the diameter of which is thirteen yards and the central height four feet; it is entirely of earth, overlaid with a few pebbles on the surface.
We began by cutting from the south side to the middle, where was no indication of interment, either upon or below the natural level; but it was seen that a grave had been made on the east side of our trench, where from the surface to a depth of two feet the earth was much darker than in other parts of the mound.
By digging in the direction thus indicated, we had the good fortune to discover the remains of a human skeleton, consisting merely of the enamel crowns of the teeth, which though themselves but scanty mementos of female loveliness, were accompanied by several articles indicating that the deceased was not unaccustomed to add the ornament of dress to the charms of nature. These comprise a handsome necklace of twenty-seven beads, a silver finger ring, silver earrings, and a circular brooch or fibula.
Five of the beads are of amber* , carefully rounded into a globular shape, the largest an inch in diameter; the remaining twenty-two (two of which are broken) are mostly small, and made of porcelain or opaque glass, very prettily variegated with blue, yellow, or red, on a white or red ground. The finger ring is made of thick silver wire, twisted into an ornamental knot at the junction of the ends.
The earrings are too slight and fragmentary for description. The fibula is a circular ring, ribbed on the front, an inch and a half in diameter, composed of a doubtful substance. The remains of the teeth show the person to have been rather youthful, and afford another instance of the extreme decay of the skeleton usual in Saxon deposits in this part of the country, whilst those which we have reason to reckon centuries more ancient are mostly well preserved.
A smaller barrow, at a short distance, was opened immediately after, affording nothing. It was composed of thin layers of differently coloured earth, amongst which dark brown, approaching to black, pre- dominated.
"ŒWill you?¹ asked Whitcomb.
"ŒOh, yes. But deuced hard work, gentlemen, especially when we must operate secretly. I¹d like to engage a private inquiry agent, but the only worthwhile one is entirely too clever. He operates on the principle that when one has eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. And time trafficking may not be too improbable for him.¹
"ŒI¹ll bet he¹s the same man who¹s working on the Addleton case, or will be tomorrow,¹ said Everard. ŒThat isn¹t important; we know he¹ll prove Rotherhithe¹s innocence. What matters is the strong probability that there¹s been hankpanky going on back in ancient British times.¹
"ŒSaxon, you mean,¹ corrected Whitcomb, who had checked on the data himself. ³Good many people
confuse British and Saxon.¹²
Poul Anderson, ³Time Patrol², Guardians of Time (Ballantine, 1960)
General Pitt Rivers (1827-1900), a flamboyant polymath, was known as the father of scientific archaeology. He was influential in four fields during his lifetime: military training, anthropology, archaeology, and public education. Very little is known about his character and career. Yet this was a man with stormy family relationships, a career in the army, activities in public education, contributions to anthropology, and impact on the development of British archaeology. A controversial man whose methods and ideals have been much quoted but frequently misunderstood and misrepresented.
Archaeology was transformed from pure treasure-hunting and dilettante antiquarianism (recall that Dr. Henry Mortimer of Hound also had excavated a few barrows in his day) to its current status as a respected scientific discipline embracing many specialties by the work of a few great men. From the circus strongman Belzoni in Egypt to the publicity-conscious plunderings of Heinrich Schleimann at Troy, most 19th century excavation had been in search of the masterworks suitable for presentation in prestigious national and private collections. Pitt-Rivers pointed out that it is the study of the ordinary everyday things that helps us to reconstruct the past. far more that the rarer, valuable objects that were unusual even in their original point in space/time. To me, General Pitt-Rivers seemed an ideal brother-of- the-mind to Sherlock Holmes, and a likely person to have called in the consulting detective in a matter of excavatory mystery.
Rising to the rank of lieutenant general in 1882, Lane Fox now Pitt-Rivers was appointed the next year as inspector of ancient monuments. He had recently inherited a substantial estate, including part of Cranborne Chase in Dorset. He had wealth, the confidence born in his distinguished military career, and plenty of time. Pitt-Rivers began to excavate the mounds and monuments on his lands.
* Tudor flagship sunk in Portsmouth harbor, and recovered in an inspiring effort, and much of it in an astonishing state of preservation, in the 1980¹s.
* Likely to have come as tradegoods from the Baltic region.
* with reference to: 1. the 1991 bio by Mark Bowden
2. The Practical Archaeologist by Jane McIntosh, (1986)
3. The Adventure of Archaeology, by Brian M. Fagan (National Geographic Society, 1985, 1989)
4. Tracing Archaeology¹s Past: The Historiography of Archaeology, ed. by Andrew L. Christenson (Southern Illinois University Press, 1989)
5. Quest for the Past, by Brian J. Fagan (Addison-Wesley, 1978)
6. Megalithomania, by John Michell (Cornell University Press, 1982)