Daniel Stargate Recs Jack

Updated May 13, 2001


Mostly slash. But spiked with gen. Which tells you a lot about how badly I crave good writing in this fandom, since I am an unrepentant bred-in-the-bone slasher--a freakish fascination to my friends, in fact. I initially intended to recommend every single edible story I could find. Though it's still a relatively small pool of stories to choose from right now, I've decided to scale back my ambition and just give you some links to other rec pages: Most of the stories I rec are found on the Area 52 or JDFX slash archives. For the ones with an Area 52 address: if you like to read notes and spoilers you can always page down quickly to the end of a story, then click through to the author's archival homepage. Any notes will be found there. Sometimes my own notes will have spoilers or hints about content, though I usually try to avoid serious ones. If you trust me, you can always click through on a title before focusing your glazed gaze on my comments.

= A special favorite, sometimes for writing, sometimes for kink, sometimes for both.



May 13, 2001

square Buddies by Quinn (slash) -- Three thematic vignettes.

Why you should read this: Jack angst, Daniel angst, a sense of pervasive greyness and despair, angst angst angst.

What might throw you off stride: Occasional word and phrase choices that rang off-key, like "the freshly brewed beverage," "brethren," "clenched tight in delicate hands," and so on--some were off-key just in general, others were voice issues. But they don't dominate the narratives.


square Ace O'Neill Stays Focused and Avoids a Tangent and Ace O'Neill Narrowly Thwarts Disaster and Chaos by Tenaya (slashy) -- Sort of like the Stargate version of a "Nancy Clue" or "Hardly Boys" story.

Why you should read this: Parody, Jack "Mary Sue" O'Neill, good clean fun. Slashy fun. Plus, I don't know about anyone else, but I'm picturing comic book color illustrations: panel one, steely-eyed Jack sitting in the cockpit of his deathglider against a background of stars; panel two: Daniel's anxious face as he listens to the radio transmission. I have...eeriely clear visuals.

What might throw you off stride: Well, she's not off writing rape stories, and I'm personally kind of bummed. But these are damn funny.


square This is It by Quinn (slash) -- By the author's description: "This story is AU and occurs several years ahead in SG1's future."

Why you should read this: It doesn't reflect on this author's story at all, but I'm having one of those days where I don't feel like trying to find stuff to say. I just want to rec stuff. "Oh, go read it," I say. I mean, if you're visiting this page you're probably desperate for Stargate fiction. I could tell you  there's a good Stargate story printed on a 2"x3" scrap of waxed paper and included in 10% of all Cracker Jack boxes, and you'd probably go buy out the store. Anyway. This story's good.

What might throw you off stride: Um...that's kind of a bad pun. I'm just not going to go there.


The Body Electric by Merry Lynne (gen) -- Let us pause a moment to celebrate the wonder that is Merry Lynne. When done pausing, please form an orderly line to receive this stor--oh, oh fine. Just trample right over me, will you.

Why you should read this: Well, there's the whole wonder-that-is-Merry factor, then--like the pot of gold at the end of the Merry rainbow--the story itself, which has a sort of yummy Doublemint Twin thing going on; dialogue so precisely on target you'd swear she had GPS tracking installed in her cute little cranium; deadpan humor; light threads of angst; the uncannily canonical rendition of every twitch, tic, and eyebrow flicker of the characters; and an ending that brings a big, happy, dorky grin to your face. Or at least to mine.

What might throw you off stride: Wet pickles on the linoleum.


Storms by Merry Lynne (gen) -- What I love about Merry is that even when she writes gen, you can shade your eyes and squint far ahead toward the horizon and see the faint, shimmering outline of slash in the distance. Oasis? Mirage? You decide.

Why you should read this: There aren't many writers who can nail so subtle a conflict and its crisis, so beautifully. I am fairly sure I couldn't, and I'm damn sure I could never have written this story, even in my dreams. As Doc would say of Ringo: "Now I know I hate him." I must add that when you read one of Merry's stories it's as if you are right there in the room with the characters. Where'd that tiny pistol of mine go, anyway. Seems to have fallen out of my cuff.

What might throw you off stride: This is a few degrees off my own semi-developed interpretation of Jack, but that's the beauty of IDIC applied to fan-fic. Oh wait. That's my stride, not yours. Never mind, then. Get your own stride.
 


"I have not yet begun to defile myself."

square Into the Maelstrom by Molly -- An intriguing, different story. Much thanks to Katharine S. for pointing me toward this.

Why you should read this: A small flock of amazing insights, a few particularly brilliant lines that will take your breath away, and a carefully braided narrative that builds from mild unease to haunted loss. Also: Daniel being difficult and repressed and conflicted about his feelings. Yes! It's also a story that treats seriously Daniel's relationship with his wife.

What might throw you off stride: It's difficult to read in parts, a bit diffuse and vague in style--maybe even overwritten. But even the mistiest bits of writing contribute to the story's atmosphere, if nothing else. Also, though Jack's dialogue can seem a bit off-kilter, it's worth noting that the story gives you reason enough in terms of plot to accept any off notes. Do read to the end even if it initially appears not to be your stylistic cup of tea; the story switches gears here and there, and the mix sort of comes together at the end.
  


square The Measure of a Man by Geminia -- Kind of a fixer-upper for "Double Jeopardy" (and other eps). Just updated; there's a part one and part two now. It appears to be the beginning of a longer work in progress. This is from part two:

Why you should read this: Some clumps of good dialogue, a mostly convincing Hammond, a brief spotlight on android love, and a handful of moments that feel canonical (e.g., Daniel and Fraiser wrangling in the background).

What might throw you off stride: A light sprinkling of spelling and textual errors, Jack being obvious, Hammond being a wee bit yentalike (though a thick coating of decent characterization helps distract from this), occasional off notes, and--to be honest--no real intensity. This is like pie from the vending machine in the middle of night shift. Custard, maybe. But I'll keep watching the progress of these stories. 


square Certainty of Chance by Kleio -- So, I was scrolling through the archive looking to see if there were updates and suddenly stumbled over an author. "Kleio," I noticed. "That seems like the name of someone sane and intelligent." I could have sworn that I looked through the entries for every author, exhausted all possibilities, but apparently not.

Why you should read this: Intelligence, whiskey, wrestling, Geek Daniel, the pursuit of  tundra, man-to-man urination, and Jack saying, "Have a taste of chance, my gloomy friend."

What might throw you off stride: Some strings of polysyllabic words that elevate the diction a bit too high and which could have been simplified. It's not so much an issue with Daniel's dialogue, but with odd sentences like: "He kept registering the messages from his senses but no further processing was possible, no perception could be formed from the sensation." Still, this is the exception rather than the rule, and you should be able to glide across such patches of glossy ice and reach the next nice bit of writing without sprawling.


square Up Close and Personal by Kleio -- And another from Kleio. Clee-oh. Klee-o. Klay-oh? Clay-O. Mmm, yeah. Move along, people. I'll just be resetting my babble meter to zero now.

Why you should read this: Men hanging from chains, in the dark, nose to nose and irritable. Many fast, sharp lines of whip-cracking dialogue...

What might throw you off stride: ...and many other lines that fall flat on the ground like limp, sticky spaghetti. It's uneven, to be sure. And there's really no excuse for the ending. But overall it's maybe, I dunno, three-fifths perfect? Four-fifths? Enough fifths for me to rec this unapologetically.


square Ex Tempore by Kleio -- This author is clearly determined to right the wrongs of canon; whereas the show will consistently pair off the wrong two team members (Jack/Sam, Jack/Teal'c, Sam/Daniel, Teal'c/Daniel) whenever adventure comes a-knockin', Kleio kindly makes sure that Jack and Daniel are always stranded and imprisoned together. A kind and generous woman.

Why you should read this: Loopy Priest Rumlna ("the liver tells me..."), purification rituals, abundant cultural references, a judicious application of canon, the act of divine love, a Daniel who sounds like Daniel, a Jack who sounds like Jack. In fact...ah, Jack. Man, Kleio can write some kick-ass Jack dialogue, uncannily sharp lines that could have been lifted right off a shooting script: "So, the Goa'uld tore these people away from their spaghetti plates, how does that help us?" And: "Well, there *is* a very close relationship between my hand and..." Um, yes.

What might throw you off stride: A small chunk of story with no paragraph breaks; what seem to be a few fairly crucial missing lines of dialogue; a uniquely disturbing sexual scenario; some misogyny; some blood; the usual off notes (often followed by sheer beauty); and an abrupt, lame ending. What can I say. It's a mixed bag--some of it is simply hit-the-sweet-spot amazing, and some of it is rather appalling--and it's still worth reading.


"I'm military, I love pain."

Objectives by Lady of Shalott -- Okay, so you have to realize that this author began writing after watching six episodes, and immediately sent a wicked dart winging smack-dab into the middle of both characterization and kink. You have to hate her. You have to worship her actually, because I'm pointing this staff weapon at you and my word is law.

Why you should read this: There's a justification for fannish cliches, and it's stories like this. Cliche, like Michelle, is such a common name, but then you meet Cliche, who is like no other Cliche you've ever met; she's sharp and she's chic and, yes, she wears trendy designer clothes but she makes them her own, she puts her stamp on them, she sets the trend, she reinvents it and makes everyone else look drab. Cliche, you murmur as you gaze at her piquant face over candles, then later, dreamily in your sleep.

Which is just another way of saying: this story rocks. And then gets them off.

What might throw you off stride: Oh...nothing, maybe? Yeah, nothing. That's it.
 


Reveille by Lady of Shallot -- And then she wrote this, damn her beautiful eyes.

Why you should read this: Jack and Daniel and bittersweet angst and malak and neuronal symbiotes.

What might throw you off stride: Shoelaces, snakes in the road.


The Cost of a Used Spaceship by Marie Blackpool -- Run, don't walk.

Why you should read this: There are no words. But if I tried, I might say: angst, layers, chills, and the slow brilliant ripping of one's heart.


square Alter Ergo by ELG -- An examination of latent possibilities building from "Urgo," and going much further than syndicated television would ever allow. Thank god.

Why you should read this: An unusual story framing of a fun, abandoned romp. County fairs, heavy drinking, Daniel saying: "Well I have mixed feelings about being a piece of pie." The story's focus and thorough treatment gives more more attention to consequences than to the initial debauchery, which is refreshing.

What might throw you off stride: Oh, maybe there's some tiny nugget that could theoretically work its way between your foot and your shoe, but I'm in my honeymoon period right now and I can't think of anything. Of course there's always the "More sex, please" request. But I'm trying to set that greed aside and stop using words like "tawdry" and "yum" in every other sentence. At least for Lent.
 


square Undercurrents by ELG -- A sequel, of sorts, to "Alter Ergo."

Why you should read this: You like prisons, right? And amnesia? I knew you did.

What might throw you off stride: It's surprisingly easy to get past the nominative facade of "John" and "David" and see into the characters, but still--there's sometimes cognitive dissonance. We also have Jack thinking of Daniel as a "boy." Not once, or twice, but often. Mmm, yeah, okay. Oh, and the clothes shopping...stuff. Let's just not think about that. In short, there are some issues here. But I'm in a forgiving phase right now, and this is a nice, broad fantasy.


square What this Is by Emma Woodhouse -- Emma Woodhouse! Apparently Emma went from Sentinel to Stargate and then up and disappeared, leaving behind only this one lone SG story in the archive, dated late 1999.

Why you should read this: Ohhhh, um. Sex. Fondling. Primal sex. And other good stuff. A surprising balance of kink and character professionalism. I don't know how to describe it better. Example: Jack experiences something that should be highly mortifying, but instead pulls it together and behaves very maturely about it afterwards. Likewise, Carter, Daniel, et al. Oddly, I'm not sure that level of calm is entirely plausible at times, given the circumstances, but it certainly helps keep the story on an even keel.

What might throw you off stride: There are excruciating, intrusive exclamation points in Very Wrong Places; and capitals are used for emphasis. (To be fair, this is common in many archived stories. It may be an uploading macro.) Also, if you have an embarrassment squick, it may be pinged. As with a hammer. But despite issues, this was worth reading. In fact, my kinks were ringing like happy little bells, but that's just me.
 


Forced Perspective by Tenaya -- Welcome to my world of kink.

Why you should read this: Which particular kink are we talking about here, you may be wondering? Mwah ha ha ha...ahem. Well, those of you who don't like rape stories will want to know that this is one, and those of you who do like rape stories will want to know that this is one, so let's just get that spoiler out there: hey, this is a rape story. And it's a cool rape story: it's deeply hot, it's partner rape, and Daniel's reactions could not be more perfect. (Note: When partner rape is good it's very, very good, and when it's bad it's icky.)

What might throw you off stride: The first half of the story was stronger than the second half, I thought--including Daniel's reactions. But it's only a relatively small dip in intensity and focus, and it may just have been my own idiosyncratic reaction.
 


square After All by Sar -- I had to upturn every single stone in the field to find this quiet little gem. Of course, this is why I never get around to doing laundry on the weekends. But it was worth the time and effort, even though I ended up on Monday wearing those ancient trousers which originally lived somewhere near my ankles and eventually shrunk into ersatz Capri pants. I'm glad I can share these things with you.

Why you should read this: Daniel feels and sounds and reacts like Daniel, and Jack like Jack. The situations feel believable. The resolution feels rights. It's just a feel-good story. Well, it's a layered, somewhat angsty feel-good story.

What might throw you off stride: The quotes were unnecessary, and I think Jack would have waffled a bit more uneasily about the issue. (You know, the issue.) But otherwise, this is straightforward and good and doesn't make your head hurt.
 


square No Consequences by Brenda Anders -- Based on the ep "Window of Opportunity."

Why you should read this: Kissing and some good shots of Jack/Daniel. 

What might throw you off stride: Jack is a bit lovey-dovier than I like, but even that has its sweet moments. The broader characterization--well, I tend to feel that the author's nail gun missed Jack and shot its load into the wall. (Gosh, that sounds obscene.) Daniel's a bit more on target, perhaps simply because it's not his POV. But there's writerly effort here, and it's unlikely anything will throw you violently out of the story.



 
square Ritual by James Walkswithwind -- I've given you the link to the Area 52 archive, but note that this is actually at http://www.jbx.com/~gila/ashel/rit.html. Why you should read this: It introduces an interesting question and dilemma, and elaborates on them.

What might throw you off stride: The writing is rather pedestrian, the characterization feels off, and there are a few Britishisms. With a carefully obscure allusion to plot, I'll also mention that I think Jack caves too quickly and would not let things go down like that. "Gosh, you're a bitch, Anna," you may be thinking. "Why rec this then?" Well, pie may not be the same without Urgo, but it's still pie.


square Time by Mandalee -- A reasonably long story. On an alien planet. With sex.

Why you should read this: Sniping and goading and deliberate planning to get laid. Remembrance of Peter. The whole pussycat-and-toaster thing. Jack's canny manipulation of Sam and Teal'c.

What might throw you off stride: That canny manipulation--well, you kinda have to wonder how Jack would feel if something had gone horribly awry in his plans. On a mission. A military mission. But oh well. The story is also pretty long, as mentioned--and while that's usually good, the story is all about one thing, and the pacing can drag now and then. So though I like long stories by nature, I feel a bit equivocal reading this. Nonetheless, this is a decent slice of pie.

I like this pie metaphor, by the way. This may have to become the 'pie rating' rec page.


square Empty by Mandalee -- Fascinating angstfest. Crossover with Sentinel.

Why you should read this: Really cool narrative device, hot men, erotic musings. Slide up a level and you can contemplate the refraction of unspoken love, the prism of point of view, the circulation of requited lust. Smooth and quite absorbing. Plus the--well, it's almost an assumption of crossover that the story is built on, without context, and the savvy simplicity of this works very well.

What might throw you off stride: Probably helps if you know both fandoms. I did not appreciate this story as much when I was solely into Sentinel.


square The Beggar's Ride by Russet McMillan -- Russet's lone venture (so far) into Stargate fiction. All tacky pleading for more has been deleted from this entry and replaced by this sentence.

Why you should read this: High kink factor, and Russet's enaging writing style.

What might throw you off stride: Characterization is askew, as if the author was getting a feel for things but hadn't nailed the material yet. Still worth reading.



 
Keiko Kirin's stories -- Keiko is kicking this fandom's ass. More about her stories to come, but in the meantime, go read!



 
go back and look at the hippie boy
(Not in frames? Click here to go home.)