sentinel story recs

story recs: sto·ry reks (1) yet another thing
you do to avoid a work in progress

About the layout  Updated 11/22/2001
Yeah, okay, seven months--hey, I was napping.
scary-anna-skull
Sentinel Recs  Sentinel Recs 2000  Sentinel Classics 101  Reviews

"Like the Neanderthals," Jim said seriously. "Only, with MasterCard." 

 

Sentinel Classics 101
 
Imagine you want an introduction to the broad scope and historical trends of slashy Sentinel fic. Be great if there was a class, you think. Like, "Intro to Sentinel Slash Literature 101." If there were such a class, the titles given below would constitute the 101 required reading list. And, at least for the purpose of this lame analogy, the Sentinel Recs list would be supplementary reading. In truth, there's really no substantive differences between stories in each section, but for this required reading list, I'm picking mostly older stories; the exceptions are significant stuff that I missed while making my other recs.

These classics are an "anthology" of some of the first stories that were archived, some utterly great stories, influential stories, hefty stories, fanon making stories, the oft-discussed, and those that have adapted the old standards. (Such as, "We're undercover. We have to pretend to be gay.") Some may be true classics in perfection, some not, but mostly these are the stories that stuck with me after I'd plunged headlong through my honeymoon phase and come out the other side. And this list still does not even try to represent all the hits of Sentinel fiction. Many of the writers have many more fabulous works in the archive, beyond what I've included here.


Click here to check out the classics!


 
Sentinel recs

With these briefly recced stories you're getting a format deliberately created to offer a light dash of minty honesty. I gave some careful thought to making recs, given that I generally like to read a story fresh, without spoilers. I've decided to give brief excerpts, and a point-counterpoint explanation of why the story is recced. Some description might slip in but I'm avoiding summaries along the lines of "This is a story about how Jim journeys to Peru and learns a few things about love and jaguars." I am also not citing ratings, story types, or other notes. Right now these are all Sentinel recs, so if you don't want the direct route to the story page, most are searchable in the archive. When I don't link to the archive, I don't link at all, which is why you sometimes see plain-text URLs. Why do I do this? Basically because I'm too lazy to write people and ask permission to link to their pages. 

There may be relatively broad, mild spoilers in the recs, but no substantial ones that I can think of.

These are in no particular order, and don't always represent my traditional 'favorites' of the authors. Eclectic and idiosyncratic recs are what we have here. And mileage may vary, as they say. You may, as you read, recognize a theme of envy threading through these recs. Just bear in mind that seething envy is usually my highest form of flattery.

Yes, that's pretty sick.


Toy Story by Alanna -- So, it's been seven months since I made a rec. I've read some stories during that time, but I don't click my 852 Prospect bookmark five times a day like I used to, a habit which always gave me a headstart on story recs. Even so, Jim and Blair still push my buttons big time, and though it's weird--and perhaps kind of pointless--to start in once again reccing stories that everyone has already read, I say, what the hell. I think we're still roping in a fair number of newbies every year, and maybe they'll come here one day and find this page useful.

This story is exactly what it sounds like, and it has a fun straightforward style.

Why you should read this: Scaldingly hot sex, scrumptious descriptions of Jim that ignite vicarious lust (or, hey, just lust), solid pacing and style and voice, and all in all much creamy goodness. Alanna has another good story, written with Kass, "Testing." Check it out. The characterization premise is a bit of a stretch, but who cares, it's still yummy.

What might throw you off stride: I'm thinking, you know, the dildos and stuff. But I've never really liked sex toys in slash stories before, and I liked this. Talent makes anything possible. You can be a Broadway star! You can make silicone sexy! There's also the timing of the story--in terms of the series--which not everyone may credit, but it shouldn't throw you out of the story.


Truth, Death, and Donuts: Learning Curve II by Antimony Hayes -- I don't remember any more what I used to write up here before quoting from the story. I look back at earlier entries, and think, yeah, whatever. Just get to the point.

Why you should read this: Pen stealing and office snippiness; rainy lettuce and key lime pie; the truck ride of togetherness; male bonding and donuts. Just a whole lotta good stuff. Also with manly hugging and manly blushing and manly waffling, and other types of repressed guy-schmoop, and more great zingers than you can shake a stick at. (I have no idea what this phrase means, but I think you should visualize these zingers as small feral prairie dogs surrounding you in the desert, while you slowly circle in place and shake a stick at them. Thank you.) If this story were a song, it'd be the Manly Schmoop song. I don't know what it'd sound like precisely, but it'd be kind of mellow, with a lot of low guitar strumming and you could play it in the middle of the night and feel a warm melancholy.

What might throw you off stride: There's not a Learning Curve III yet.


Waterfall by Betty Plotnick -- She's so damn predictable. Predictably good, I mean. I like that in a chick, even if she is a pseudonymous wench whose identity eludes me and makes me feel like Jack McGee seeking the mysterious man behind the Hulk.

Why you should read this: Because she's so Betty. You don't need to ask "Why read this?" You need to ask for her autograph, man. And then, if you find out who this cupcake is, tell me.

What might throw you off stride: Sudden curbs.


Paying the Rent by elaine -- I can't help it. It's a guilty pleasure. And since I read every line of this story, unlike some others that may be more accomplished in style, I feel it deserves a rec. The title really says it all. This is very definitely an AU, where reality has branched off, and the characters are younger.

Why you should read this: All the little cliches will cling to you, leechlike, sucking out your will so you have no strength to close the browser window: heroin addiction, prostitution, redemption, childhood molestation, therapy. NearlyJailbait!Blair meets ProtectiveMushball!Jim and live happily ever after in the Land of the Loft. It's good, not-so-clean fun. And can I just stand up and say, "Hello, my name is Anna, and I'm a sappy drama queen." Because this story puts out there, in pixels, the realization of a hundred tawdry fantasies I too have had, in which I revolve the clock back a dozen years, plunk a scrappy street kid named Blair down in Jim's buff, protective arms, and launch into a private tale of high-school attendance, clandestine boffing, MasterCard expenditures, helpless indulgence, yuppie house buying, and deep sexy wrongness.

What might throw you off stride: The style is workmanlike, and there aren't any lines that achieve lift-off from the steady, level prose. But authorial restraint keeps this from sinking into a pit of cheesy melodrama, unlike some other stories I can think of but kindly won't name. Like, the whole child abuse thing is thrashed through, and there's some forced sex, but there's no gratuitous humiliation of the kind that makes you want to go take a shower. It has, you know, dignity. There's a certain type of recognizable authorial intrusion in how Blair ("the boy") is reinvented into a young, smooth-chested man-child, which is fortunately redeemed by such things as the discovery of secretive shaving.


Distant Journey, Unknown Lands by Martha and Lemon Drop -- coming soon

Why you should read this: -- ditto

What might throw you off stride: -- loose shoelaces


Coming Home by Calista Echo (Sentinel) -- There is nothing like 315k of epic hurt-comfort to restore one's faith in a fandom. This is a sequel to Stealing Home. I  really enjoyed this, even though I have not read "Stealing Home." I remember skimming it (another big dish--356k) and thinking it looked kinda interesting, but for whatever reason, I did not engage. The sequel, on the other hand, drove bang out of the gate right into the heart of my hurt-comfort kink, and I read it straight through in about two hours. Glory. I kinda think this is readable as a stand-alone. But, I could just be crazy and influenced by previous skimming.

Why you should read this: Hurt. Comfort. Chocolate. Peanut butter. Gin. Tonic. These. Are. Met. A. Phors. What I'm really saying here is: angst, torment both mental and physical, miscommunications, pain pain pain, violence, comfort, healing, cuddling. Yum. With skill and at great length, the story twists in the psychological corkscrew and then uncorks the bottle and decants us into a limp pool of exhausted satisfaction. Man, we've needed this.

What might throw you off stride: Some typos--but sprinkled through a huge story, and so not really that noticeable--and probably a few other things I could think of if it weren't one a.m. Um, okay, here's something: the story got a bit sketchier, a bit vaguer, toward the ending. The horse was a little tired as it crossed the finish line. But it was a lovely ride.

Update 4/4: I just heard that this was posted as gen elsewhere, which suggests that the ending was tacked on. Explains a lot. I suppose that the reverse could be true--it could have been chopped off to make it gen (think about that analogy a moment). Still, this kinda bugs me and makes me question whether I was in optimal reading mode at eleven o'clock at night--did I miss broader flaws? I don't know. I'm not going to change my rec, but it's something to think about.

Update 4/4: And with yet another update--I heard from the author after a list thread about this story and am feeling more sympathetic again. No, I'm not PMSing, thank you very much. Go away.


Lemon Tea by cmshaw (Sentinel) -- I was hunting through the archive tonight, looking for stuff I haven't read in a while or--rolling the dice--never read. I ended up lighting on cmshaw's stories. I have read them, but it's been a year or so. In some stories, like Silk, the writer does enough good things that I can enjoy re-reading it, but enough squicky things that I find it hard to rec--and does one right after the other, which just amazes me. Best example of this phenomenon in one small package is the sentence beginning: "Bracing Jim's hip with a splay-fingered grip...." Splay-fingered grip! That's fabulous! And it rhymes with "hip" and it's in iambic pentameter! That's excruciating! In the story as a whole there are passages where the blend of realism, characterization, and eroticism make the writing as good as cake batter. Then a scene or a phrase comes along and it's like--fly in the batter, spit it out!

Anyway, 'Lemon Tea.' This is an interesting writing exercise:

So, yeah, check that out. You may want to look at Angel of Death, too. Not very slashy, but kinda warm and life-affirming. I have to admit I haven't really looked at this author's short stories--those in the 4k range. But if you like the ones I've linked to, you could hit the archive and go browsing.


Learning Curve by Antimony Hayes (Sentinel) --  It's so nice when you can use an apt quote from a story.

Just kidding, Antimony, I don't want you to go into nursing.

Yet.

Why you should read this: So many delightful moments that I should really quote more of them, but that would suck out all the fun of discovering them as you read the story itself. Or the story yourself. Or...something.

What might throw you off stride: A few questionable plot points, but focus on the pretty men and you can breeze right over them.


Umbrella Bones by Tangent (Sentinel) -- First posted story by this author. Holy cow.

Why you should read this: Crisp, concise writing, and a beautiful locket-sized portrait of Blair. If there were a "Blair talks to an umbrella" story challenge, this would be the prizewinner. This concept works better than you'd think. In fact, this little story rocks, and the umbrella becomes an effective emblem for...well, I'll let you find out. Always a thrill to see a writer going with the creative flow, not afraid to try something new and different. This fandom lives. Okay, sorry. Sniff.

What might throw you off stride: Tiny bubbles in your wine.

Update 3/29: Bare Bones, a sequel to 'Umbrella Bones,' is already up. It's a fuzzy cuddle:

That's sweet, isn't it--but I think my favorite line of the story might be: "I have a lot of stories on my hard drive."


Changes by Jean Kluge. One of the classics of the fandom, now finally online at Jean's homepage, found here: http://www.squidge.org/~theabode/jean/.

Why you should read this: This is one of just two or three Sentinel stories I've ever read that made my chest clench up tight, made me feel true empathetic anguish, made me cry. Someone, I can't recall who, once called this a rara avis, a true 'catharsis' story, and said that at the end of the story you feel a sense of release, of joy. I pretty much agree with that.

What might throw you off stride: It may not be everyone's cup of tea--in fact, though this is mostly well-loved, I've seen a few strong critiques. You either accept the premise or you don't. It's a story crafted on carefully chosen terms, with a deliberate pace and focus. But even when I have issues with the pacing, or wordiness, or the length of attention given to a scene or subject matter, I'm also aware that these things serve the author's purpose. The thing is, respect for the characters permeates the fabric of this story, and demands that a certain respect be paid to the story itself--sure, I could pick at it using beta-vision and maybe mention some specific things that are less than perfect. I've actually done that on list, but I don't want to do it again here. Just read it, you maroon.


Knoxville by Resonant (Sentinel) -- The author calls this: 'The "lost sequel" to Tender.' I've been meaning to rec this for quite a while, and found evidence of this intent in my inbox. Oh, blessed bloody inbox. Inbox of death. I raise my hands to shade my eyes, squint into the distance, but the trail of littered e-mails stretches back too far and I cannot see its point of origin...oh, shut up and on with the rec.

Why you should read this: It's cool, and you know you wanna.

What might throw you off stride: You are walking along the street, reading a print-out of the story, and suddenly you catch sight of Richard Burgi signing autographs outside of your neighborhood Starbucks, not five feet from you. You trip, stumble over an abandoned latte, and land on your belly, fan-fiction flying from your feeble hands. Richard bends down and picks up a stray sheet and reads, "Sandburg, why do you want to imagine me outdoors naked?"

Aside from that possibility, you should have no issues with reading this lovely little story.


Call Him a Dog by Lanning Cook (Sentinel) -- I tried to find the perfect short excerpt for this, but given the point of view it was hard to find one that would be clearly meaningful without a slightly broader context; so this is a bit longer than the norm I strive for.

Why you should read this: Strong, fresh POV and true-blue cop characterization; much humor; tightly-wound and territorial Jim; nicely rounded supporting characterization; lots of deliciously foul language; and the satisfaction of seeing the universe right itself.

What might throw you off stride: Deliciously foul language, and you have to suspend your disbelief at a significant point in the story. But this is Lanning Cook, man, and for crying out loud you'd better not give this a miss.


Unified Fields by Antimony Hayes (Sentinel) -- A short little story (8k) described as "The happy beer-fuck story."

Why you should read this: It's short, it's cute, it's got wildly bouncy curls...oh, you know what I mean. It's a bit like Francesca's "Nothing On" in premise, and with a briefer execution. The writing here is clean and crisp. It's like eating a pear. A small pear, over too soon.

What might throw you off stride: If you can buy the theory that a couple of guys would cuddle even before they caught a clue, then you'll be good to go. Otherwise, you may balk.


What we want and what we get by DcSunset (Sentinel) -- First posted story by a new author.

Why you should read this: This qualifies as one of the uncommon stories that managed to catch me by surprise, in terms of plot. You'd think that with all the authors out there writing post-TSbyBS stories, we'd see more variations on What Happens Next in the guys' lives, but we don't really. This story presented a few new options in a plausible way. The author also isn't afraid to try unusual things in terms of story structure--this has round-robin POV, moving chronologically. The Blair is pretty Blair-like, and there are several places in the story that feel very fresh--as can happen when a new author suddenly blows into town and happily ignores the social obligations of fanon.

What might throw you off stride: Then there are the not-so-fresh parts, where the gods of fanon preside. But one can get past that. More critically, this cries out for a savvy beta and careful editing to clean up the wacky punctuation and capitalization, the homophones, the comma splices, and a number of other easily avoidable glitches that are strewn throughout the story. There's also the EIG factor--on the EIG ten-point scale this is an implausible seven. (Yes, I used a real formula to get that number. <g>) The story also doesn't keep the effectiveness of its format (multiple first-person narration) all the way through--it's very uneven. Even so, this may be for you, as it was for me, the kind of story that you can read with attention despite its writerly flaws. It will be interesting to see what happens with the next story or two from this author.


Possibility Number One by Lenore (Sentinel) -- Lenore is revisiting Sentinel and this should make you happy. The author's notes (which you should read, for once) suggest the, er, possibility that there may be sixty-four more vignettes like this to come. So, while I may not rec all of the next sixty-four, you should go hunt them out. Assuming she's not just teasing us.

Why you should read this: UST, it's what's for dinner. Plus, Lenore has a penchant for delving back into Jim's military past and writing him as sexually conflicted, both of which I adore.

What might throw you off stride: It's short. It inevitably gives you that "I'm just warming up" feel, and then it's over. It ends on a question and leaves you hanging. What did I say? Tease.


Footnotes by Destina Fortunato (Sentinel) -- You'll recognize this nifty prize if you bought the zine "Thinker, Tyler, Soldier, Spy." Nice to see this online, where you can adjust the font.

Why you should read this: Interesting story format, a treatment of canon that is ambitious in scope, a relationship that is allowed to build gradually, solid writing. Plus, my favorite kink is Destina-flavored kink is; we seem to share a happy fondness for give-it-up Bottom!Blair, a Blair who longs to yield submissively to the primal force of alpha malehood that is Jim.

Which is as it should be.

What might throw you off stride: Interesting story format, but a bit fragmentary and distancing; and it's a challenge to capture and sustain consistent voice for 100k. There were some times when Blair "spoken" felt more like Blair "written." Still a very worthwhile read, however.


Exposure by Donna Jones (Sentinel) -- Post TSbyBS story. Inadvertently rated G in the archive, but not rated G. Slightly more spoilers than usual below, but still generalized.

Why you should read this: This is wow. This is the stuff. Hard-core, gritty, semi-dysfunctional Jim and Blair, both of them talking and acting like men, sniping at each other and being difficult. This is the one of most realistic Jims I've seen written: a hardass, a cop, a guy fucked up by his father and emotionally shuttered. A guy who gets irritated and frustrated even with those he loves the most. This is also one of the few stories so far--along with Merry's A Quiet War--that makes me believe that Jim and Blair could have had a relationship during the whole diss debacle; where in fact the relationship actually clarifies the whole situation, so that you go, oh, yeah, that explains it.

You should also read this because it has kickass verbal fights--bang bang bang--and tension, and anger sex. It's all too rare to see sex motivated by some other dynamic, fueled by anything except the softer emotions. So good to see it here. And despite what the author says, the ending rocks. Because you know Jim's 'gift' won't really tie things up in a neat little bow--not given the characterization established here. Heh.

What might throw you off stride: All the stuff I mentioned above, you wuss.


On the Wall by Kass (Sentinel) -- Author notes in her author notes that this is the Jewish!Blair story she always wanted to write.

Why you should read this: This is just a great story, one that finally rounds out an integral aspect of Blair's character in a way that's believable, unforced, and satisfying. I am so happy to see this!

What might throw you off stride: Small monkeys biting your ankles. I'm not saying there are any in the story. I'm just saying...they would.


The Mountie Who Fell to Earth by Josephine Darcy (Sentinel) -- One of the stories from the Sentinel 'Slash Virtual Season.' A Due South crossover. You don't have to read the other SVS stories; this can be read as a stand-alone.

Why you should read this: Moose, possessive mating (not involving moose), snow, death, and a double helping of hotties. The best Due South crossover so far, with reliable characterization and a respectable plot.

What might throw you off stride: There's not just plot; there's a lot of plot. That is, some scenes strike me as the kind of obligatory stuff you might fast-forward through if you were watching actual canon. But of course, (a) it's a damnable struggle to make any cop plot fresh and engaging these days, and (b) that's why they call this the virtual season.


Thicket by Martha (Sentinel) -- We had dreamed of this moment, we had whispered of it. Ye, we had looked up into the cold glittering stars and prayed that the shackles of smarm would someday be loosened and our slashy boys freed from bondage. And when that historical night came you could hear my cries echoing across the hills and dales of fandom: "Martha wrote slash!"

Of course, others just said: "Cool. New story."

Why you should read this: This being a historical document. Also notable for being the first Sentinel slash story to integrate the Napoleon Chagnon scandal. And, okay, it's fucking fucking fucking good.

What might throw you off stride: Let's be frank here: there's nothing so horrible as being deeply entrenched in your winter slump and waking up one day to find that the Second Coming has come and everyone is hallelujahing with joy. "Why couldn't I have written that?! That should be me whose praises they sing!" you think with resentment as you roll over and snuffle, before burrowing deeper into your blankets and going back to sleep.


Cuts Deep, Demolition Woman, Penalty Box, and White Elephant by Betty Plotnick (Sentinel) -- A few are loosely related. More notable for being four swift dunks from a new writer who suddenly appeared like a sizzling flash of lightning on the court. Rather than excerpt from all four, I'll just quote at length from the now classic omelette box scene.

Why you should read this: Well, if you just read the excerpt, you don't need to be told why, now do you?

What might throw you off stride: The crippling, crushing realization that you are not Betty Plotnick.


Brokenhearted by Veronica (Sentinel) -- A romance.

Why you should read this: I was trembling on the edge of my seat for most of this. That's damn rare. Would this end in heartbreak? Doom? Death? I refuse to tell you. May the anguish of unknowing add piquancy to your reading.

What might throw you off stride: Soft-core Jim. I usually like to see a bit more edge and awkwardness in his character. Blair didn't have to bite very hard through the outer shell before this Jim melted liquescently in his mouth. So to speak. But as I said...romance. And, er, song lyrics. "Used sparingly," to quote the author. But still.



February 21, 2001: A few words about the redesign. I've put older Sentinel stories (2000 and older) on a separate page for faster loading. I've put the reviews on their own page. There are still only three, but I may do more in the future. I may make a separate page for Sentinel classics at some point too. Not sure. I'm also thinking about doing a Due South page but am waiting to see what's going to happen with the Hexwood archive. Want to send me feedback about this page? Go for it. One caveat: I'm often slow to answer my e-mail. No. Really. Really slow.

Go to Sentinel Recs 2000.

skull graphic from kat's meow
 
go back and look at the hippie boy
(Not in frames? Click here to go home.)